Skip to main content

Welcome

You have reached Andrew's Den. There isn't much to explore at the moment, but the links in the navigation bar will hopefully be of use to you.

Have I no taste?

I just discovered this Rolling Stone Rock & Roll Daily list of the top 20 Most Annoying Songs, compiled from user submissions. I am impressed: I like, to varying degrees, nine out of twenty:

  • Céline Dion, "My Heart Will Go On" (I prefer Sarah Brightman's Italian version, but what can you do?)
  • Los Del Rio, "Macarena" (I'm not crazy about it, but it's catchy)
  • Lou Bega, "Mambo No. 5" (wonderful tune, albeit horrible music video)
  • Cher, "Believe" (I love this one)
  • Aqua, "Barbie Girl" (amazing song… I'm not kidding: Aqua are one of my all-time favorite musical groups)
  • Chumbawumba, "Tubthumping" (great song; mislabeled on Rolling Stone's site as "Tub Thumper," which was the name of its album)
  • Eiffel 65, "Blue" (so-so techno song; it's okay, although not great)
  • Ricky Martin, "Livin' La Vida Loca" (really catchy; maybe a little overplayed)
  • Wham!, "Wake Me Up Before You Go-Go" (really catchy, as well; could be useful, too, for those Jitterbug mobile phone advertisements)

My musical inclinations are a little strange, I suppose, for someone of my interests.

Lyrics site conspiracy redux

I just visited a lyrics site (which shall remain unnamed, but suffice it to say that it rhymes with "www.metrolyrics.com"—oh, wait… heh) and got the attached image (PNG format). Basically, a popup "window" that wasn't an actual window, but was instead displayed overlaid within the page using JavaScript.

How bloody annoying is that? Closing it creates a cookie that will persist, it says, for three days. Still, this is an interesting direction for advertising in general: imagine if, instead of worrying about popup blockers and all that, websites started using JavaScript overlays on all their pages. Not just those annoying ones where hovering over a word will trigger it, but rather, simply visiting a page—a ton of "click to close" overlays all of a sudden populating the window would be rather annoying. This is good in that it won't pollute the rest of the windows that one is attempting to view, nor will it interfere with closing the browser. Popup blockers, however, will probably have to play a bit of catchup; they'd be "overlay catchers" now. A new market.

Enough rambling.

Oh, but one more thing. You know what really annoys me? When a website disables the command keys (I suppose, on a Windows machine, that it'd be disabling the control keys). This occurs in Safari, at least; Firefox seems to be all right, at least to some extent. On www.metrolyrics.com, once I visit an actual page of lyrics (and not just the front page), I can't close the window with command-W, I can't quit the browser with command-Q, I can't print with command-P, when all they want to stop people from doing is (presumably) copying and pasting, which can easily be done just by looking at the page source regardless. Why are they making my legitimate actions harder?

Mailing list foibles (but not mine)

Awhile back (20 March 2009, to be precise) someone posted a strange response to a confused programmer on Apple's cocoa-dev mailing list (a mailing list targeted at programmers for Mac OS X). It ran as follows:

your design simply sucks, you don't understand the library
I cannot help you on this, I am not Jesus and I cannot save all people who
are pretending to program, once again I did complex design with CA related API,
and I have never been stuck in this kind of issue, so I let you think,
nobody can solve
your issue you took the wrong way

Cheers!

O-kay… now, you, my dear reader, don't need to know that CA stands for Core Animation, or that API stands for Application Programming Interface, to comprehend the sheer affectedness of this response.

After a string of such rarely-helpful and barely-coherent responses to other users, the administrators moderated the poster. I have to say: I'm actually somewhat disappointed. I was becoming accustomed to searching my mailbox daily for these messages from the person, just to brighten my day (yes, perhaps in a perverse sort of way).

Before you suggest it, one peculiar thing is: this user is not just doing it for the attention: a user sent a message to the list that contained an off-list response from this poster (who, as you may recall, had been moderated and in this case had not posted for a while), and the off-list message was just as zany as the on-list messages. Wow.

Lyrics site conspiracy?

Every time that I visit a website with song lyrics, there's a large link on it with that says Send "____" Ringtone to Cell Phone, sandwiched between the same phone icons, or perhaps with one variant. Click through to view this entire post for attached image examples. I wonder whether all of these lyrics sites are in fact owned by the same large mega-corporation somewhere, but I suppose it's more likely that they're just receiving huge kickbacks, or that their lyrics database software requires them to insert these links. But conspiracy theories are so fun! I would do well to recall the old adage, "Never suspect conspiracy where incompetence could achieve the same result."

The re-release of Cypher

You will not likely have noticed it, but I have just re-released Cypher, my useless Perl script for encoding various ciphers. It doesn't feature too many at the moment, but it features two of my favorites: the codeword cipher (clever), and the Vigenère tableau (utterly ingenious and rather difficult to crack, considering the simplicity of the encoding process).

As it is a Perl script, full source code is implied, and it is, furthermore, BSD-licensed. I hope to perhaps expand it in the future; if you have a favorite cipher that you would like to see implemented, I would be happy to hear about it—feel free to use the Contact page to reach me, or my e-mail address (available in the Cypher download).

A P.D.Q. Bach Christmas

This afternoon a relative and I had the great pleasure of attending the San Francisco Symphony's hilarious event A P.D.Q. Bach Christmas. The man behind the music, a composer and musician named Peter Schickele, employs the persona of Professor Peter Schickele of the (fictitious) University of Southern North Dakota at Hoople.

The pieces were simply delightful (and humorous, too), with standard concert instruments (piano, flute, cello, etc.), but also many of the unexpected: an enormous gong struck with a mallet; a drum kit; and a "proctophone." Presumably one of Schickele's own inventions, this last consists of a white rubber glove into which the player blows, thus inflating it and producing a sort of flatulent sound—thus delighting children and adults alike. Also of note at one point was the moment that the conductor became distracted by texting on a mobile phone, and another when Schickele was pulled over by a traffic officer for playing too quickly on the piano ("Is this your piano?" "Do you know how fast you were playing?") Yet another highlight (for me) was when Schickele told us all about a technique developed by P.D.Q. Bach for playing arpeggios on organ pedals with the feet alone, called the "tootsie roll." This received hisses from a large portion of the audience. Some people just don't like a good joke.

Once we retired to the Green Room afterwards, I got my paperback copy of The Definitive Biography of P.D.Q. Bach autographed and had a mobile phone photograph taken with the great man himself (a picture which I shall cherish, despite its being somewhat blurry).

Who is this P.D.Q. Bach character? Without giving too much away, he's a fictional (yes, fictional) composer, ostensibly the twenty-first of Johann Sebastian Bach's twenty children (think about that for a moment), invented by the aforementioned Peter Schickele. A lot of his work plays off of romantic and baroque music, but he does a lot based on swing, oldies, jazz, and even more modern material (you are, of course, more likely to find The Beatles than to find Aqua, regardless of the cultural or intellectual validity of either, due simply to the target demographic).

According to the San Francisco Symphony's website, Schickele has been performing the works of his alter-ego (please don't tell him I used that term!) P.D.Q. Bach since 1965, and he's still going strong, and as funny as ever! I urge you to visit his website if you like; it's not a shiny, bells-and-whistles affair, but it may give one an idea of what this intellectual fellow is really about.

More reorganization

I've regrouped the Humor and Quotations section under a new "Sundries" category to keep the site looking clean. Yay for Drupal!

More site content

As you may or may not have noticed, I've expanded the site further. This includes not only a Humor section, but also additional written material (in PDF format). I'm currently hard at work on another short story, a character study about a very strange fellow. More to come!

Site redesign

What started out as adding a Writings section turned into the addition of another section, Quotations, plus a Software section that replaces my sidebar menu system for accessing my programs. A little less direct to get from the home page to Polymatic or Wget (or any other software), but also a little less cluttered, and a little more maintainable. If you have suggestions or website feedback, feel free to get in touch using the contact form.

Syndicate content